Breast Augmentation 14
Facial Fat Grafting 80
Deep Plane FNL
Fat Graft to face with Stem Cells
Erbium Sciton Laser
Upper & Lower eyelids
Neck Liposuction
Facial Fat Grafting 79
Deep Plane FNL
Fat Graft to face with Stem Cells
Erbium Sciton Laser
Upper & Lower eyelids
Neck Liposuction
Facial Fat Grafting 78
This Cosmetic Surgery Institute patient had an upper and lower blepharoplasty (eyelid surgery), an autologous fat to face transfer, and erbium laser skin resurfacing. Her quad bleph, which was administered by Los Angeles' Dr. Mo Zakhireh, helped to take years off her appearance and create a glowing skin texture.
Facial Fat Grafting 77
Deep Plane FNL
Fat Graft to face with Stem Cells
Erbium Sciton Laser
Upper & Lower eyelids
Neck Liposuction
Facial Fat Grafting 76
Deep Plane FNL
Fat Graft to face with Stem Cells
Erbium Sciton Laser
Upper & Lower eyelids
Neck Liposuction
Facial Fat Grafting 74
Deep Plane FNL
Fat Graft to face with Stem Cells
Erbium Sciton Laser
Upper & Lower eyelids
Neck Liposuction
Facial Fat Grafting 72
Deep plane FNL
Fat graft to face with stem cells
Erbium Sciton Laser
Upper eyelids
Breast Lift w/o Implants 1
This is a 22-year-old female who has always had ptotic breasts. She is currently a 34 C cup. She is 5 feet 2 inches and 135 pounds. She has grade 3 ptotic breasts with nipple-to-mid-clavicle distance of 25 cm and 26 cm. She has quite a bit of stretch marking in the upper pole of the breast above the nipple-areola complex, and her nipple areole complex is enlarged
Demographics
Details
This is a 41-year-old female who desires breast augmentation and she currently has 34 A cup breasts. She is 5 feet 7 inches and 100 pounds, and her breasts are very dense A cup breasts without any palpable masses. She had been sized in the 300 to 350 cc range the morning of surgery. She specifically wants to be augmented with 325 cc implants, and the patient has been given all of her options as far as saline versus silicone, textured versus smooth, High-Profile versus Low-Profile, above the muscle versus below the muscle, and inframammary fold approach versus nipple-areola complex approach










